Assumption Mapping

Assumption mapping reveals critical insights by categorizing beliefs about desirability, viability, feasibility, usability, and ethics, enabling practitioners to prioritize assumptions for testing based on their importance and evidence.

A museum considering collection changes to attract a more diverse audience might assume that the intended communities will value those changes enough to engage. Assumption mapping separates that belief from assumptions about resources, delivery, access, and possible harm, then compares each assumption’s importance with the strength of evidence supporting it. This gives a team a way to decide what to investigate before committing resources.

The Five Categories

  1. Desirability: Beliefs about what people want or value

  2. Viability: Beliefs about resources and sustainability

  3. Feasibility: Beliefs about technical or operational possibilities

  4. Usability: Beliefs about how people will interact

  5. Ethical: Beliefs about impacts and implications

The Four Quadrants

Plot each assumption on two axes: How important is this to success? and How strongly does relevant evidence support it? Consider how closely the evidence matches the people, situation, and decision in question. Evidence that contradicts an important assumption calls for revising the proposal, regardless of how much evidence has been collected.

Weak or Uncertain Support

Strong Support

High Importance

🔴 Leap of Faith: Test these first

🟢 Supported Assumptions: Document and monitor

Low Importance

🟡 Quick Checks: Test if easy

⚪ Supported Low Priority: Move on

30-Minute Mapping Session

List assumptions (10 min): Ask: What must be true for this to succeed? Generate as many as you can without filtering.

Plot the important ones (10 min): Select your top 5–7 assumptions. Place each on the matrix. Treat the initial placement as provisional; note the evidence and any disagreements.

Plan next steps (10 min): For each "leap of faith" assumption, identify one way you might test it. Could be a conversation, observation, small experiment, or desk research.

Testing Methods by Effort

  • Quick (hours): Desk research, asking colleagues, reviewing past data

  • Medium (days): Informal conversations with visitors/stakeholders, reviewing comparable cases

  • Deeper (weeks): Structured interviews, observation protocols, pilot programs

Source: Adapted from Teresa Torres, Evaluating Solutions: The 5 Types of Assumptions that Underlie Our Ideas (Product Talk, 2023).

Connects to: Value of Information.